Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Social Velocity

Web 2.0, Mobility, Enterprise 2.0, Communities, Wiki's, Blogs, Social Marketplaces, Social Workplaces, SaaS, PaaS, what do they all have in common?

Each of these contributes, (of course) to our ever evolving world of electronic connections, which is propelling a new wave of 'social velocity' right before our eyes.

New boundaries are pushed each and every day when it comes to personal connections on platforms like Facebook, global enterprise connectivity and international trade improves beyond traditional lines of business through creation of hybrid ecosystems that promote scalable and monetized marketplace interaction.

And it is all happening faster then most strategists can or care to measure.

What does that mean for you personally? It means you can share foodie tips with someone on the other side of the globe with just a few keystrokes, or talk about your favorite sports team, or travel destination with more vigor and passion then you do with your school mates or neighbors. Social connectivity has never been so easy. There are rules of engagement and generally speaking the communities are self-policed, so it’s real easy to follow the crowd and get involved. Try it, send a tweet this week. It’s fun.

Now how about those enterprises that everyone is talking about? How do they use this new social paradigm to their advantage? What are the rules of engagement? How easy is it to follow along? Well, times up. Do you have the answer? Truly, we are still within the very early stages of seeing enterprises push the boundaries of social velocity both in a marketplace setting as well as in a workplace environment. There are no blueprints, and no simple ‘Facebook for All’ type answers. One could assume that with so much jargon being thrown around by so many ‘flavor of the week’ vendors, this stuff must be easy. Not true. Since there is no single approach to creating true or realized social competence within a marketplace or workplace, organizations must turn to the thought leaders within the industry to help them navigate these waters. The vendors who are trying to ‘cash in’ on the ‘social hype’ and talk the talk with clients, without walking the walk remind me of the Y2K scenario. Lots of resources used, spend lots of money, no tangible or measured ROI, but there were lots of busy people!

Enterprises must work with the companies who understand how to walk the walk. Talk is cheap, time is money, and social velocity will pass you by unless you grab on, jump in, and start your enterprise strategy cycle now.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Social Software and Mobility

Over the next 3 – 5 years mobile devices will become even more pervasive within our current workplace, and mobile social software will be a key driver in pushing that growth and usage. Social Software breadth, depth, not to mention user dependency within these handheld devices will continue to expand very rapidly, device capacity and speed will improve exponentially, all of which results in a dramatic improvement in how workplace participants access people, process and content. The organizations, who understand how to harness the mobile social software platform, will become more efficient organizations; through better lines of communication, leverage intellectual capital more effectively and execute to the market more seamlessly. Social Software is in the very early stages at the moment, and it has yet to truly realize its actualized potential within the mobile ecosystem.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

The Power of Now. Social Media

Social Media…it’s all around us. But is everyone really listening?

Social Media, as well all know takes on many forms, and illicits many different definitions depending on who you ask. Some participants are conscious and active within various communities, and take on ‘power or influential’ social media roles within the ecosystem. Super guru’s they take on industry wide status of some elite, higher form, typically a position that you cannot lobby for, it’s something you earn over time and the masses will bestow such a rank upon you (sorry but you can’t interview for this). It should be noted that corporations and brands can and do, take on powerful and influential social media presence, which is independent of the social media guru roster that they may/may not have assembled within the collective corporate employee base.

While most of us see Social Media to be something that can be found all around us, it is still remarkably easy to find participants who are dismissive to their social media interaction. For instance, someone told me the other day at a conference, “Oh I have no idea what Social Media is……but I am on FaceBook now” (See Boomers Flood Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/l4j9ko) We still need to consider these personas as part of the Social Media Club, even if they are a little new, and perhaps naïve to it all.

Beyond the naïve there are individuals who are neither conscious nor absent minded when it comes to social media, the activities, benefits, and overall upside. They fall into the category of, ‘individuals with time constraints’. They look to others for a crash course in how it all works, then typically re-produce their new found knowledge as gospel. It’s interesting to watch these types of people. I am sure you know of a few!! :-)

Show me someone who does not read the paper (includes online), watch the news on TV or keep up to-date socially through their collective network of colleagues/family/friends with current events and I will show you someone who is one step disconnected from what is going on. Similar theme can be extrapolated to Social Media. The further removed you are from the epicenter of social activity, the less you comprehend/understand what is really happening, your peer/colleague influence is drastically diluted, and most importantly your thought leadership suffers as a result of not being vetted by the crowd.

Social media is around us, the sooner you figure out how you want to leverage it, the better off everyone else will be. Most of us are listening, but who has time for Social Media? - The Movers and Shakers do!! Get some.

My suggestion is to pick one of the following, regardless of whether you are a corporation or individual when thinking about what to do with Social Media: Watch (with purpose), Follow, Participate, Lead or get out of the way!

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

The epoch of 2.0

As we view the road ahead, it becomes quite clear that providing consultative type thought leadership is important. Interested to hear feedback on the following areas that can either make or break adoption of 2.0 technology. From a sales perspective our teams today understand a prospects corporate culture and their understanding of technology, however, the Rank/Hierarchy and Generational aspect of what Bloom is, becomes something new for us. Adoption of Records Management while probably more mandated, is less likely tied to your generation, where as adoption of social networking (if not mandated) is much more aligned to a generational aspect of oneself. (All things being equal. Budget, Vertical, Geographic HQ location, Current technology environment, Existing business and partner influence/relationships etc..)

4 interesting areas affecting adoption:

Culture - The culture within an organization will ultimately help predict whether or not they will be successful with a SMP and SWP.(Likewise with our existing ECM technology)

Technology - Do individual members have an aversion to it or not (Likewise with our existing ECM technology)

Rank/Hierarchy - Who will be using the technology? Senior executives or information workers? 60 laywers from a law firm may use records management but not use SWP technology, but good chance their 180 legal assistants and clerks would utilize a SWP environment. Bloom helps us drive depth.

Generational - What does Generation 'Y' prefer over Gen X? The information worker of the future will be all about access. Do not inhibit my ability to access people, business process or content. Using same law firm example as above. If those 60 lawyers are all 65 they may not use SWP/Bluefield type functionality but their assistants/clerks would. However if the lawyers are all 30-35 yrs old then it may be said that this group would embrace SWP environment ALONG WITH their clerks/assistants. UI and personalization is key.

Understanding Culture, Technology, Organizational Hierarchy and the Generational demographics within an organization helps us to be proactive in our positioning.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Mobile, Mobile Everywhere! But who really manages my collaboration and content?

Mashups, 2.0, Enterprise Collaboration, Wiki, Blog, Silo, Cloud Computing, SaaS, PaaS, ISV’s, Social Media, Social MarketPlaces, Social WorkPlaces, Bloom, Web Solutions, Digital Media, 3.0, Social Collaboration, Mobile Media, Mobile Enterprise, Mobile 2.0, Social 2.0, Digital Assets, Digital Management, and the list goes on. It's more then E-Mail Management!

There are more buzzwords today then in the history of human kind.

What separates the word of the week from the fads? Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference. One aspect of technology that continues to amaze is mobility. Mobility meaning not just the individual who is mobile, but more so the individual who carries a cellular phone (simply having a laptop with WiFi does not qualify you as mobile in my books…sorry).

It should also be noted that this will not be a token post, which is so common these days, talking about Twitter/Facebook/Linkedin or ‘other’ social sites despite the ability for a mobile user to access content, people, and whatever associated ‘process’ they have linked with either of those two areas.

It’s about mobility, and more importantly the data, and even more importantly who is managing that data for you and how.

Let’s start with the obvious player, the mobile handset manufacturers. They are pushing the pace like never before with innovative hardware features (like iPhones 3-axis accelerometer), better batter life, more powerful cameras, increased memory, speed, size and weight of device, and it seems there is no end in sight.

Mobile handset manufacturers (RIM, iPhone, Motorola, Nokia, Palm) have played a tremendous role in how applications are delivered into the marketplace. Could anyone have imagined 10 years ago that Apple would be a substantial player in the smart-phone space?, let alone have an ‘online mobile applications store that would generate a BILLION downloads’? (Apple app store is currently sitting at 962 Million downloads and counting). Hard to believe they have been this successful when you look back at the business principles the telecommunication carriers previously managed hardware providers with.

Second part of the equation is the ISV or independent software development companies. They spend their life developing applications for mobile users of all walks of life. Some ISV’s develop their applications to support a particular platform or device, and leverage the native environment, and perhaps some loyalty with the hardware providers. Other ISV’s choose a more agnostic web browser approach and home to appeal to the masses as a result of their breadth of device and browser support. ISV’s have flourished in both areas, and it remains to be seen which end game delivery, the market will ultimately gravitate towards. Their primary delivery platform used to be the carrier portals. Well all that has now changed with the advent of the ‘app stores and viral social media sites’. Mobile users whether it is for personal use or business driven, are exposed to so much more information then in years past. I have to believe that adoption levels (downloaded over the air applications on mobile devices) have increased not solely on the fact that there are more apps available, but more as a direct result of unbridled access, and strong social recommendations.

Third part of the mobile trifecta is the telecommunication carriers themselves (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, Rogers, T-Mobile). Not one to be seen as a behind the curve old school institution, the carriers are frantically trying to manage an overwhelming amount of ISV relationships, online portals (building and managing), relationships with hardware providers who are bringing devices to market at an unheard of pace, and aside from managing towers and bandwidth constraints, they have the most difficult task of all, how to monetize this entire picture. It’s not an exact science and historical references for ‘this is how we used to do it back in the old days’ is just that, beyond dated. Pushing the pace is not something new, but keeping up with this flurry of exponential innovation that surrounds them in their current ecosystem, is new on more then just one front.

The question of who cares about ‘the data’ is multi-level. One, everyone wants you to consume it, whether it be on their network (carriers), their device (handset guys) or use their software (ISV’s). Carriers make money on the bandwidth and data plans. Handset manufacturers are just happy you keep using their device, as device churn is a bad thing for them, and of course the ISV’s only survive on the revenue linked to you using their application (whether through ads or direct license revenue etc..). But who really manages the data that you consume on the device?

When the next generation of bandwidth, devices and ISV applications allow you to search, find and retrieve much larger volumes of data for more then simple visual consumption, for example display data types via an optical lens or in a 3D hologram format James Bond style on your device, there will only be a few companies that will be able to sort the vast tags, secure the information, and allow you find/share/edit the parsed voice or data bits that you have created all from your device. The current line up of Enterprise Content Management firms would be the logical choice as they are the closest to this model, at least on the enterprise side. Open Text is one such company, that understands the enterprise complexities of records management better then anyone. Preparing for the unknown future data formats, not to mention the terabytes of data that are on the way and the medium in which everything is controlled and accessed, is a bigger challenge then most realize. We live in exponential times. Content is king and the masses have spoken.

We are only just beginning the mobile revolution. The first wave was mass adoption, at cost effective prices. Access has never been cheaper in some areas, while others would argue that the carrier monetization engine is broken. Despite the costs, and the economy the way it is, mobile is here to stay, not as a luxury, but as a staple. People will not give up their phones. The second wave of this evolution is the revolutionary way in which we use the devices to access people, content and our daily business or social schedule. If MySpace was a country it would be the 11th largest in the world, which means we are all probably a little less then 6 degrees from Kevin Bacon. Finding out who likes Larry King or follows CNN on Twitter is pretty easy to answer. Finding out who attended the CTIA conference in San Francisco last year from my company is a little trickier. Why should it be? The data exists. Who owns it? Controls it? And how can I get access to it? Transparent pervasive views to the data storage of choice, mobility users want it, the question in how soon can they get it.

So what does all this mean? It’s a complicated cat and mouse game of who builds, who promotes, who delivers, who is the bigger dog in the supply chain, and who makes money on what. Sometimes the status or relationship from one ecosystem member to another can change in the blink of an eye. Which is why it is imperative to stay focused on the bigger picture, as progress does not take a back seat to organizations trying to figure out their pecking order.

With content being king in the mobile space, the control and management of that data will prove to be more then just a lifeline. Companies who are up to the task of building the next gen data management and control (read: safe) environments, and they must get it right, will be the tipping point for something so much bigger: Mobile Part 2.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

eDocs for iPhone

Matrix Logic Customers are now able to view and manage documents via their iPhones

ShareThis

CHICO, Calif., March 18, 2009 — Matrix Logic Corporation (http://www.matrix-logic.com) has developed a new application that enables customers to use their iPhones for accessing business papers on their Open Text eDOCS ECM solution when away from their desks. The WirelessDMS iPhone Client application is compatible with both the Apple iPhone and the iPod touch, and is available at no cost from the iPhone App Store.

Once the client application is downloaded onto an iPhone, it accesses documents through a network connection with a WirelessDMS iPhone Server module that can be purchased and installed on office servers. “As far as I know, this is the only application of its kind for any document management system,” said Stephen Page, President of Matrix Logic. “Its development is part of our commitment to enabling users’ access to crucial information anytime, anywhere.”

With just a few finger taps, iPhone or iPod touch users can employ features such as Recent Edits, Quicksearches and scaling or rotating capabilities. “The iPhone comes with the ability to view Office documents, PDFs and images. We handle all other file types by sending them in HTML format,” explained Page. “That ensures that users can view anything.” The WirelessDMS iPhone Client also has full contacts integration on the iPhone, so in addition to viewing documents, users can e-mail them as attachments or references.

“Now, if you’re out of the office when a client calls with questions about a proposal that’s on your office server, you can use your iPhone to search for the file and view the text as you discuss it,” said Page. “You don’t have to rely on your memory, wait until you’re back in the office, or find a wireless network in order to log into your office system from your laptop.”

“Another benefit is that it’s now extremely easy for iPhone users to e-mail files when traveling or just on the go,” continued Page. “If you forget to take along a document, you don’t have to wait for someone to fax or e-mail it. In both cases, you just whip out your iPhone.”

The Open Text eDOCS solution is appropriate for organizations of any size and allows lifecycle management of content for the enterprise. Matrix Logic offers a one-time license purchase fee for the DMS server and an annual charge for a Software Subscription Service (SSS), which provides users with software updates and technical support.

Released on January 20, 2009, the WirelessDMS iPhone Client is part of Matrix Logic’s Wireless Document Management Suite (WDMS) of applications, which allows users to access office content from a variety of handheld or wireless devices. The client application requires iPhone 2.0 Software Update, and the WirelessDMS iPhone Server is available for purchase from Matrix Logic. For more information about the WirelessDMS iPhone Client, visit http://www.matrix-logic.com/demos/WDMSiphoneApp.asp.

Contact:

Stephen Page
Matrix Logic Corporation
spage@matrix-logic.com

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Social Networks, Social Marketplaces, Social Workplaces and the Mob

"Change someones access to information and you change their relationship with it"

Do You Censor Yourself on Social Media?

Do others censor themselves on social media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Blogs, etc.? The whole idea of Web 2.0 and social media is transparency - but does that mean that you should say and post whatever you want? Or because of the neverending/everlasting network that is the Internet, do we need to be even more careful about what we say and post?
http://socialmediatoday.com/SMC/79694

Global Market for ECM Technology to Increase to $519 Billion

According to a new technical market research report, ELECTRONICS CONTRACT MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SERVICES: THE GLOBAL MARKET (MFG021A) from BCC Research , the global market for electronics contract manufacturing (ECM) technology was worth $321.0 billion in 2008. This is expected to increase to over $345.0 billion in 2009 and $519.0 billion in 2014, for a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5%.

The market is broken down into the application segments of computers and telecommunication, consumer and industrial electronics, and others. Computers and telecommunications have the largest share of the market, generating $207.0 billion in 2008 and an estimated $225.0 billion in 2009. This should reach $352.0 billion in 2014, for a CAGR of 9.4%.

Consumer and industrial electronics were worth $92.0 billion in 2008 and an estimated $96.5 billion in 2009. This segment is expected to increase at a CAGR of 7.2% to reach $136.7 billion in 2014.

Other application segments generated $22.0 billion in 2008. This should increase to $23.5 billion in 2009 and $30.3 billion in 2014, for a CAGR of 5.2%.
Electronic contract manufacturers use a wide array of productive functions pertaining to printed circuit board and hardware assembly, as well as product engineering at the board and systems level, component design, process engineering, parts procurement, product fulfillment, logistics and distribution, and after-sales services and repair or sometimes installation services. From the standpoint of the labor process, these functions can be grouped around the design and assembly of printed circuit boards and related components, the final assembly of systems and logistics and inventory-related work.

Electronic contract manufacturers are serving a growing range of product markets including personal computers and servers, Internet routers and switching gear, communications equipment (especially mobile phones), consumer products such as computer game or television sets, industrial and automotive electronics, as well as space and aircraft electronics.

Compliance Building

Social Compliance and what it means to your organization. We have discussed this numerous times as it relates to 'enterprise strategy'. Here is a piece on compliance building with some real data behind it. I wonder if the decision of "to block or not to block", becomes even more important then whether a company chooses between "participate or not to participate" in social collaboration.

http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2009/03/10/online-social-networking-is-it-a-productivity-bust-or-boon/